Jailbreaking your iPhone now legal, as it should be

Imagine not being able to change the spark plugs in your vehicle. Or think about the prospect of purchasing a car and not being able to put water in the radiator, or put on your spare tire. That’s essentially what Apple has done with its attempts to ensure that users don’t jailbreak their iPhone. Thanks to changes in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, however, jailbreaking the iPhone is now just as acceptable as jailbreaking your automobile.

The new rules are centered around six classes of copyrighted works.

  1. Motion pictures on DVDs
  2. Computer programs that enable wireless telephone handsets to execute software applications
  3. Computer programs, in the form of firmware or software, that enable used wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telecommunications network
  4. Video games accessible on personal computers and protected by technological protection measures that control access to lawfully obtained works
  5. Computer programs protected by dongles that prevent access due to malfunction or damage and which are obsolete
  6. Literary works distributed in ebook format when all existing ebook editions of the work (including digital text editions made available by authorized entities) contain access controls that prevent the enabling either of the book’s read-aloud function or of screen readers that render the text into a specialized format

For purposes related to this blog post we’re going to discuss the second class:

Computer programs that enable wireless telephone handsets to execute software applications, where circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of enabling interoperability of such applications, when they have been lawfully obtained, with computer programs on the telephone handset.

Evidently, Librarian of Congress James H. Billington believes that iPhone owners should be able to use their iPhones for computer programs not specific to the iPhone. Quite frankly, I don’t know why Apple executives don’t feel the same way. I mean, you’d think they’d want to sell more iPhones.

Despite being a big Apple fan, this is the right decision, and it doesn’t just apply to Apple. It applies to all phone manufacturers. Reality is, you are buying the phone so you have the right to do with it what you please. It’s as simple as that.

Be your own producer with social magazines

Many years ago, just prior to the birth of the World Wide Web in 1995, a friend and I attempted to create something unheard of at the time. The idea was based on that of a print magazine but would feature two things uncharacteristic of a magazine:

a.) Interaction
b.) Personalization

We weren’t sure how to pull it off, as print media does pose limitations. We didn’t even have a clear idea all that it would ent

ail.

What we did know was that we wanted to come out with a periodical print, probably once a month, featuring stories, local businesses, local people, local events and activities, all the normal stuff that would appear in a local journal, but we wanted a way to interact with people as close to real-time as possible and also keep the publication personalized, letting readers influence their own experience.

Not surprisingly, the idea never went anywhere. Primarily because we couldn’t figure out technologically how to achieve what we desired. We didn’t even get far enough with the idea for funding to become an obstacle. But we spent months with the idea in our think tank.

In recent years, I have come to realize that it blogs have been achieving some aspects of this  idea since the late 90s, so in a way when I think back to our efforts I recognize that while the idea at the time may not have been possible, it was this type of thinking that led to the innovation of blogs and social media.

But now something new is on the horizon that is almost PRECISELY what we ultimately wanted to achieve nearly 20 years ago. It’s called a social magazine and you can read about it on a recent post at HubSpot called The Next Big Thing for Marketers: Social Magazines.

A social magazine is based on the notion that tablet computing, such as the iPad, is here to stay and that consumers now need and have the ability to custom tailor their marketing experience.

Already there are applications such as Flipboard and Pulse for the iPad that give users the ability to pipe in content from various sources and organize it in a way that allows them to consumer the information to their taste.

As HubSpot points out, social magazines are important for marketers because they a.) reduce info-noise; b.) are rich with visuals; c.) result in social segmentation.

The noise reduction benefit is huge. People are overwhelmed today with information and the pursuit is on to filter and reduce this noise to its most useful and beneficial purpose for each individual.

The visual aspect is important because micro-blogging, which arguably has dominated conventional blogging, is limited when it comes to multimedia. Social magazines keep micro-blogging on the forefront and incorporate rich multimedia experiences.

The segmentation aspect, which in a way coincides with noise filtering, gives consumers the ability to custom tailor the information they consume. Essentially makes the consumer the architect of his own experience.

Ultimately what social magazines bring into the world is the possibility of making sense of the ever-chaotic Internet for each individual. Unlike radio and television programming, which packages choice select content determined by the producers and delivers it to viewing and listening audiences, social magazines let the consuming recipient be his or her own producer.

How will this impact your marketing efforts as a business?

Are you going to re-develop your websites for Apple's iPad?

A recent report on Marketplace by Farhad Manjoo from Salon.com throws out a compelling case as to why Apple has chosen to abandon Flash support on it’s new iPad. The decision by Apple to do this was not an idealistic one to simply “snub” Adobe as Manjoo puts it. It was a calculated choice based on where the Web is headed – a web without Flash. As you can imagine, this has sparked a bit of controversy.

But Adobe’s Flash, which was originally created by Macromedia many moons ago, has always been somewhat controversial. Many once argued that Flash ruining the web, making it clunky and cumbersome for people to experience web pages. However with the increase in bandwidth that has become available, and the improvement in web browser technology, I don’t think that argument holds much water. Flash has made our web experience far more interesting and constructive.

The debate in its simplest form goes like this: Apple’s new iPad does not support Flash because it it is banking on a Web that does not hinge on Flash for video display and interactive media such as gaming and advertising. This future is only possible because of HTML5, the next generation of HTML.

HTML is the construct on which everything you experience on the Web is founded. HTML is like the brick and mortar of a physical building. It is what makes the things you see in a web browser able to appear. Without HTML, you can not view a web page. Any web page.

HTML5 supports video on the web differently from how you watch video now, which is through plug-ins – small pieces of software that install on your computer and permit you to view things in your web browser like video. Flash is a plug-in provided by Adobe and it is the most widely used plug-in for video display. HTML5 permits websites to display video much like the way images are displayed, so essentially it eliminates the conflicts many people encounter attempting to watch video on the web, e.g. long download times, crashing browsers, etc.

HTML5 sounds ideal, eh? Well, it is. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that Flash is on its way out.

As John Herrman explains on gizmodo.com, the stir is only a stir and Flash is not going away, at least not any time soon. There are numerous reasons for this and Herrman gets into them at length in his article “Why HTML is not going to save the Internet“. With Apple’s track record for anticipating the future of certain technologies, you can imagine the stigma surrounding this topic.

In the end, it’s Apple taking the big risk here. iPad users will not be able to experience websites running Flash which 85 of the top 100 most popular sites use to display content like videos or games or slide shows. If you go to those sites with the iPad, you’re likely to see an error icon instead.

With this chance, Apple is counting on web developers to make non-Flash versions of their sites using HTML5 standards for video and advertising. If the iPod is any testament to how the market could respond, it is possible we will see a lot of shuffling going on over the next few years in how websites are developed. Are you going to re-design your websites to meet HTML5 video standards that do not require Flash or other plug-ins?